Backfiring of Political Predictions

#ffffff;" />voters and stun competitors. They also predicted that
There’s a lot of difference between expectingMichael would not win but lose by a marginal number
something to happen, hoping for something to happen,to John McCain, Arizona’s maverick senator.
assuming that something will happen, and predictingNone of this came true! John never contested the
something to happen; logically or otherwise. Whileelection and as far as presidency is concerned, we all
predicting on the basis of logical assumptions is all right,know that the winner is Barrack Obama.
I simply don’t understand how some folks riskJim Cramer, one of the popular CNBC host informed
their reputation by not only predicting something publicly,publicly in March’08 that Bear Sterns is not in
but saying it with so much confidence, you’dtrouble and no one in their right minds should disinvest
think they replying “yes” to beingfrom it. What happened? Within six days, the stocks
question “are you alive”. Here are someprice went down by ninety percent and was finally
“outrageous predictions” whichsold to JPMorgan Chase for pennies.
backfired on those who made them (you may or mayIn mid 2008, Arjun Murti, the oil analyst at Goldman
not have read about them; nevertheless, worthSachs predicted oil to touch $200 a barrel within 6 to
reading):24 months. As of writing this, it seems to touch a
Somewhere in mid 2007, Dennis Blair and Kennethrecord low of $40.
Lieberthal had predicted that “The risks toThe British newsweekly ran an editorial praising the
maritime flows of oil are far smaller thanquality of Kenya’s democracy and predicted
assumed”. They gave several reasons to backthat it might set an example for the rest of the
their words. These were: It would require a navalcontinent. This came just a week before the
power having the strength that matched the US, topresidential elections. Not by a long shot! What
seriously disrupt oil shipments. Secondly, limited regionalfollowed was a horrible month of riot and bloodshed.
conflicts wouldn’t much affect traffic, simplyVoter fraud and ballot stuffing were some great
ruling out any economic effects if terrorists attacked“unpredictions”, if such a word exists in
the shipping industry. They even said that tankers arethe dictionary. Over 800 people (official figures only)
not so vulnerable. What happened?were killed and a phenomenal 200,000 were injured
November’08 saw a group of Somali piratesand /or harmed in the carnage. The country was
hijacking a Saudi oil tanker carrying 2 million barrels ofdeeply divided and the government was delegitimized,
crude oil in the Indian Ocean. Surprisingly, they camewith power shared between the President Mwai Kibaki
only in “inflatable rafts”! As per theand Raila Odinga, his challenger.
Piracy Reporting Center, ship hijacking by pirates hasFinally, if you remember the case of the Large Hydron
actually quadrupled this year! Ironically, the essay wasCollider, the scientist Walter Wagner predicted that
called “Smooth Sailing: The world’sthere was a great possibility of creating destructive
shipping lanes are safe”.theoretical anomalies like black holes, strangelets and
In the beginning of 2008, BusinessWeek had predicteddeSitter space transitions. This would alter matter and
that New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg will enter thedestroy the planet. He had filed a lawsuit against the
presidential race on the basis of his financial powerEuropean Organization for Nuclear Research which
and organization; which was expected to impressbuilt the collider. What happened?